Atlantic Circulation over the Mendeleev Ridge and Chukchi Borderland from Thermohaline Intrusions and Water Mass PropertiesRebecca
Woodgate, Knut Aagaard, Jim Swift, Bill Smethie and
Kelly Falkner
|
NSF-OPP
0117480 |
| Abstract Manuscript (downloadable as pdf) Figures |
|
Please contact Rebecca Woodgate (woodgate@apl.washington.edu) for use of any of this material
Abstract|
Hydrographic and tracer data from 2002 illustrate
Atlantic water pathways and variability in the Mendeleev
Ridge and Chukchi Borderland (CBLMR) region of the
Arctic Ocean. Thermohaline double diffusive intrusions (zigzags) dominate both the Fram Strait (FSBW) and Barents Sea Branch Waters (BSBW) in the region. We show that details of the zigzags temperature-salinity structure partially describe the water masses forming the intrusions. Furthermore, as confirmed by chemical tracers, the zigzags peaks contain the least altered water, allowing assessment of the temporal history of the Atlantic waters. Whilst the FSBW shows the 1990s warming and then a slight cooling, the BSBW has continuously cooled and freshened over a similar time period. The newest boundary current waters are found west of the Mendeleev Ridge in 2002. Additionally, we show the zigzag structures can fingerprint various water masses, including the boundary current. Using this, tracer data and the advection of the 1990s warming, we conclude the strongly topographically steered boundary current, order 50 km wide and found between the 1500 m and 2500 m isobaths, crosses the Mendeleev Ridge north of 80 N, loops south around the Chukchi Abyssal Plain and north around the Chukchi Rise, with the 1990s warming having reached the northern (but not the southern) Northwind Ridge by 2002. Pacific waters influence the Atlantic layers near the shelf and over the Chukchi Rise. The Northwind Abyssal Plain is comparatively stagnant, being ventilated only slowly from the north. There is no evidence of significant boundary current flow through the Chukchi Gap. This work is funded by NSF and made possible by the dedicated, hardworking, professional support of the USCGC Polar Star crew, the science party of cruise CBL2002, and the USCG Science Liaison. We also thank the Barrow Arctic Science Consortium, and the North Slope Borough for their assistance. |
|
Polar Science Center, University of Washington, 2005
|
Figure 1.
Maps of the study region, showing (left) the
position of the Chukchi Borderland and Mendeleev Ridge
in relation to the rest of the Arctic, and (right)
details of the bathymetry in the Mendeleev Ridge and
Chukchi Borderland (CBLMR) area. Black dots mark the
CTD casts of the CBL2002 research cruise on the USCGC
Polar Star. Depth contours are (left) schematic and
(right) from IBCAO, at depth interval of 500 m. Pl
stands for Plain. CGap stands for Chukchi Gap. Herald
Valley and the Chukchi Slope extend off the bottom of
the map. |
| Figure 2. Plots
of CTD, XBT or XCTD data from a variety of Arctic
missions, taking place between 1993 (top left) and
2002 (bottom right). Dot color (as per color bar)
indicates maximum temperature (in C) deeper than 150
db, i.e., the temperature maximum in the Atlantic
water layers. Depth contours are from IBCAO, at depth
interval of 500 m. See Section 3 for discussion. |
|
|
Figure 3. Schematic of effects
of mixing processes in temperature-salinity space,
as described in the text. Thin dashed lines
represent schematic isopycnals. (a) Starting from
two distinct water masses (black dots) in
temperature-salinity space, mechanical mixing
yields a resultant with water properties lying on
a straight line between the parent water masses
(dashed line with arrows labeled MIX ). In
contrast, double diffusive processes act to
equalize temperature faster than salinity, with a
resultant change in temperature-salinity space as
indicated by wiggly arrows labeled DD . A
combination of these processes (double diffusion
and mixing) allows the resultant water to lie
within the dark grey zone (assuming both processes
are roughly equally present). Whatever combination
of processes act, the resultant cannot lie outside
the light grey area. (b) Schematic of the mixing
of two distinct water columns, as described in the
text. (c) Thick solid line shows the resultant of
mixing the two water columns of Figure 3b (shown
here as dashed lines) isopycnally in equal
quantities. (d) Thick solid line shows a possible
outcome of double diffusive (DD) processes acting
on the interface between the two water columns
(dashed lines). Note in the region where the
difference between the two water columns is larger
(here at lower salinities, labeled Big ),
the zigzags are of larger amplitude and the peaks
are more spaced in density than in the region
where the two water columns are similar (here at
higher salinities, labeled Small ). (e)
Thick solid line shows the hypothetical decay of
the structure of the solid line zigzags of Figure
3d by small scale vertical mixing. The amplitude
of the peaks erodes, but the spacing of the peaks
in density space remains much the same. Thin solid
lines mark the new envelope of the maximums and
minimums of the zigzag structures, and this
envelope will be used in Figure 3f. (f) Taking the
thin solid lines of Figure 3e as the parent water
columns, thick solid line shows a possible outcome
of double diffusive processes acting between these
columns. Note that although the zigzag amplitude
is the same that of the thick solid line in Figure
3e, the spacing of the peaks in density space is
much smaller. This difference in structures
between Figures 3e and 3f allows us to distinguish
the initial separation of the parent water masses.
|
|
Figure 4.Potential
temperature (theta) versus salinity plots for
CBL2002 CTD data from the northwest slope of the
Chukchi Rise. For Theta-S plots (right), grey dots
show the entire CBL2002 data set, with locations
given by grey dots in the left-hand maps. Oblique
dotted lines are sigma-0 isopycnals in kg/m3. Within
each row, individual profiles are marked in color,
both on the map and on the Theta-S plot. For the
maps, depth contours are from IBCAO, at depth
interval of 500 m.
|
Figure 6. Scatter-plots of
potential temperature (theta) against salinity for
the CBL2002 data set for (top) CTD data colored with
CTD-oxygen; (middle) CTD data colored with oxygen
saturation; and (bottom) bottle data colored with
CFC-11. Note that for clarity only 1/10th of the 2
db CTD data are used for the top two plots
|
| Figure 5.
From left to right, profiles with pressure of
potential temperature (theta), salinity, dissolved
oxygen (oxyg) and CFC-11 for station 33 (80 14 N, 172
50 W, black dot and profiles in top two panels of
Figure 4) in the Canada Basin. Asterisks denote bottle
data, with horizontal lines marking estimated error
bars as per Section 2. For CFC11, these error bars are
too small to be visible on this scale. Errors for
profile data are as discussed in Section 2, i.e., ~
0.002 C; ~ 0.002 psu; ~ 1 dbar; < 2 umol/kg
(CTDoxygen, calibrated against bottle samples). |
|
|
Figure 7.
Potential temperature (theta) versus salinity plots
for CBL2002 data set. Oblique dotted lines are sigma-0
isopycnals in kg/m3. In each panel, grey indicates the
entire data set, with colored lines representing
various profiles from locations shown schematically in
the inset map. Color indicates approximate water
depth, with black being deep and red being shallow.
The range of stations numbers used for each panel is
labeled in the top right of each panel. Panel layout
represents geography of the region. For example,
sections from north of the study zone are on the top
row of the figure, and stations from the west are on
the left-hand side of the figure. See Section 4.3 for
discussion |
|
Figure 8.
Composite plot of location (top row); potential
temperature (theta) versus salinity (second row); CTD
oxygen versus salinity (third row); and CFC-11 versus
salinity (fourth row) for the CBL2002 data in the
property regimes corresponding to the approximate
depth range of the Fram Strait Branch Water (FSBW).
See Section 4.3 for discussion. |
|
Figure 9. Composite plot of location (top row); potential temperature (theta) versus salinity (second row); CTD oxygen versus salinity (third row); and CFC-11 versus salinity (fourth row) for the CBL2002 data in the property regimes corresponding to the approximate depth range of the Barents Sea Branch Water (BSBW) and the deeper waters of the Arctic Ocean. See Section 4.4 for discussion. |
| Figure 10. CBL2002 data
showing for each station (top left) CFC-11 value
linearly interpolated onto the pressure surface of 375
db; (bottom left) CFC-11 value linearly interpolated
onto the pressure surface of 700 db; (top right) mean
potential temperature (theta) averaged between 200 and
700 db; and (bottom right) mean CTD oxygen averaged
between 600 and 1000 db. (Note that the eastmost
station of our data is outside the boundary current
and thus cooler and lower in CFC-11 and oxygen than
its neighbors, and that due to the order of plotting,
this data point partially obscures the higher values
in adjacent stations.) |
|
We gratefully acknowledge financial support for this work from the National Science Foundation (NSF), under grant numbers NSF-OPP-0117480, NSF-OPP-0117040, and NSF-OPP-0117367.
Back to Chukchi Borderland Homepage
Back to High Latitude Dynamics Homepage