Atlantic Circulation over the Mendeleev Ridge and Chukchi Borderland from Thermohaline Intrusions and Water Mass PropertiesRebecca Woodgate, Knut Aagaard, Jim Swift, Bill Smethie and Kelly Falkner |
![]() NSF-OPP
0117480 |
Abstract Manuscript (downloadable as pdf) Figures |
|
Please contact Rebecca Woodgate (woodgate@apl.washington.edu) for use of any of this material
Abstract
Hydrographic and tracer data from 2002 illustrate Atlantic water
pathways and variability in the Mendeleev Ridge and Chukchi Borderland
(CBLMR) region of the Arctic Ocean. Thermohaline double diffusive intrusions (zigzags) dominate both the Fram Strait (FSBW) and Barents Sea Branch Waters (BSBW) in the region. We show that details of the zigzags temperature-salinity structure partially describe the water masses forming the intrusions. Furthermore, as confirmed by chemical tracers, the zigzags peaks contain the least altered water, allowing assessment of the temporal history of the Atlantic waters. Whilst the FSBW shows the 1990s warming and then a slight cooling, the BSBW has continuously cooled and freshened over a similar time period. The newest boundary current waters are found west of the Mendeleev Ridge in 2002. Additionally, we show the zigzag structures can fingerprint various water masses, including the boundary current. Using this, tracer data and the advection of the 1990s warming, we conclude the strongly topographically steered boundary current, order 50 km wide and found between the 1500 m and 2500 m isobaths, crosses the Mendeleev Ridge north of 80ºN, loops south around the Chukchi Abyssal Plain and north around the Chukchi Rise, with the 1990s warming having reached the northern (but not the southern) Northwind Ridge by 2002. Pacific waters influence the Atlantic layers near the shelf and over the Chukchi Rise. The Northwind Abyssal Plain is comparatively stagnant, being ventilated only slowly from the north. There is no evidence of significant boundary current flow through the Chukchi Gap. This work is funded by NSF and made possible by the dedicated, hardworking, professional support of the USCGC Polar Star crew, the science party of cruise CBL2002, and the USCG Science Liaison. We also thank the Barrow Arctic Science Consortium, and the North Slope Borough for their assistance. |
![]() |
© Polar Science Center, University of Washington, 2005
![]() |
Figure 1. Maps of
the study region, showing (left) the position of the Chukchi Borderland
and Mendeleev Ridge in relation to the rest of the Arctic, and (right)
details of the bathymetry in the Mendeleev Ridge and Chukchi Borderland
(CBLMR) area. Black dots mark the CTD casts of the CBL2002 research
cruise on the USCGC Polar Star. Depth contours are (left) schematic and
(right) from IBCAO, at depth interval of 500 m. Pl stands for Plain.
CGap stands for Chukchi Gap. Herald Valley and the Chukchi Slope extend
off the bottom of the map. |
Figure 2. Plots of CTD,
XBT or XCTD data from a variety of Arctic missions, taking place
between 1993 (top left) and 2002 (bottom right). Dot color (as per
color bar) indicates maximum temperature (in °C) deeper than 150
db, i.e., the temperature maximum in the Atlantic water layers. Depth
contours are from IBCAO, at depth interval of 500 m. See Section 3 for
discussion. |
![]() |
![]() |
Figure 3. Schematic of
effects of mixing processes in temperature-salinity space, as described
in the text. Thin dashed lines represent schematic isopycnals. (a)
Starting from two distinct water masses (black dots) in
temperature-salinity space, mechanical mixing yields a resultant with
water properties lying on a straight line between the parent water
masses (dashed line with arrows labeled MIX ). In contrast,
double diffusive processes act to equalize temperature faster than
salinity,
with a resultant change in temperature-salinity space as indicated by
wiggly
arrows labeled DD . A combination of these processes (double
diffusion
and mixing) allows the resultant water to lie within the dark grey zone
(assuming
both processes are roughly equally present). Whatever combination of
processes
act, the resultant cannot lie outside the light grey area. (b)
Schematic
of the mixing of two distinct water columns, as described in the text.
(c)
Thick solid line shows the resultant of mixing the two water columns of
Figure
3b (shown here as dashed lines) isopycnally in equal quantities. (d)
Thick
solid line shows a possible outcome of double diffusive (DD) processes
acting
on the interface between the two water columns (dashed lines). Note in
the
region where the difference between the two water columns is larger
(here
at lower salinities, labeled Big ), the zigzags are of larger
amplitude
and the peaks are more spaced in density than in the region where the
two
water columns are similar (here at higher salinities, labeled
Small
). (e) Thick solid line shows the hypothetical decay of the structure
of
the solid line zigzags of Figure 3d by small scale vertical mixing. The
amplitude
of the peaks erodes, but the spacing of the peaks in density space
remains
much the same. Thin solid lines mark the new envelope of the maximums
and
minimums of the zigzag structures, and this envelope will be used in
Figure
3f. (f) Taking the thin solid lines of Figure 3e as the parent water
columns,
thick solid line shows a possible outcome of double diffusive processes
acting
between these columns. Note that although the zigzag amplitude is the
same
that of the thick solid line in Figure 3e, the spacing of the peaks in
density
space is much smaller. This difference in structures between Figures 3e
and
3f allows us to distinguish the initial separation of the parent water
masses.
|
Figure
4. Potential temperature (theta)
versus salinity
plots for CBL2002 CTD data from the northwest slope of the Chukchi
Rise.
For Theta-S plots (right), grey dots show the entire CBL2002 data set,
with
locations given by grey dots in the left-hand maps. Oblique dotted
lines are
sigma-0 isopycnals in kg/m3. Within each row, individual profiles are
marked
in color, both on the map and on the Theta-S plot. For the maps, depth
contours
are from IBCAO, at depth interval of 500 m.
![]() |
![]() Figure 6. Scatter-plots of
potential temperature (theta) against salinity for the CBL2002 data set
for (top) CTD data colored with CTD-oxygen; (middle) CTD data colored
with oxygen saturation; and (bottom) bottle data colored with CFC-11.
Note that for clarity only 1/10th
of the 2 db CTD data are used for the top two plots
|
Figure 5. From left to
right, profiles with pressure of potential temperature (theta),
salinity, dissolved oxygen (oxyg) and CFC-11 for station 33 (80º
14 N, 172º 50 W, black dot and profiles in top two panels of
Figure 4) in the Canada Basin. Asterisks denote bottle data, with
horizontal lines marking estimated error bars as per Section 2. For
CFC11, these error bars are too small to be visible on this scale.
Errors for profile data are as discussed in Section 2, i.e.,
~ 0.002 °C; ~ 0.002 psu; ~ 1 dbar; < 2 umol/kg (CTDoxygen,
calibrated against bottle samples). |
![]() |
![]() |
Figure 7. Potential
temperature (theta) versus salinity plots for CBL2002 data set. Oblique
dotted lines are
sigma-0 isopycnals in kg/m3. In each panel, grey indicates the entire
data
set, with colored lines representing various profiles from locations
shown
schematically in the inset map. Color indicates approximate water
depth, with
black being deep and red being shallow. The range of stations numbers
used
for each panel is labeled in the top right of each panel. Panel layout
represents
geography of the region. For example, sections from north of the study
zone
are on the top row of the figure, and stations from the west are on the
left-hand
side of the figure. See Section 4.3 for discussion |
![]() |
Figure 8. Composite plot of
location (top row); potential temperature (theta) versus salinity
(second row); CTD oxygen versus salinity (third row); and CFC-11 versus
salinity (fourth row) for the CBL2002 data in the property regimes
corresponding to the approximate depth range of the Fram Strait Branch
Water (FSBW). See Section 4.3 for discussion. |
![]() |
Figure 9. Composite plot of location (top row); potential temperature (theta) versus salinity (second row); CTD oxygen versus salinity (third row); and CFC-11 versus salinity (fourth row) for the CBL2002 data in the property regimes corresponding to the approximate depth range of the Barents Sea Branch Water (BSBW) and the deeper waters of the Arctic Ocean. See Section 4.4 for discussion. |
Figure 10. CBL2002
data showing for each station (top left) CFC-11 value linearly
interpolated onto the pressure surface of 375 db; (bottom left) CFC-11
value linearly interpolated onto the pressure surface of 700 db; (top
right) mean potential temperature (theta) averaged between 200 and 700
db; and (bottom right) mean CTD oxygen averaged between 600 and 1000
db. (Note that the eastmost station of our data
is outside the boundary current and thus cooler and lower in CFC-11 and
oxygen
than its neighbors, and that due to the order of plotting, this data
point
partially obscures the higher values in adjacent stations.) |
![]() |
We gratefully acknowledge financial support for this work from the National Science Foundation (NSF), under grant numbers NSF-OPP-0117480, NSF-OPP-0117040, and NSF-OPP-0117367.
Back to Chukchi Borderland Homepage
Back to High Latitude Dynamics Homepage